对于好意思国奥运选手埃里扬·奈顿类固醇阳性的声明

咱们精通到《环球时报》发布了对于好意思国奥运田径新星埃里扬·奈顿（Erriyon Knighton）欢快剂阳性疑窦的报说念。看成好意思国奥运田径代表队的选手，奈顿在本年3月26日的欢快剂赛外查验中被查出呈类固醇（群勃龙）阳性。但好意思国反欢快剂机构（USADA）在巴黎奥运会国内预选赛启动前倏得作出决定，宣称奈顿的阳性着力是由畅通员食用了受耻辱的肉类引起的，决定不合其扩充禁赛处罚，并允许他最终代表好意思国干预巴黎奥运会。而USADA在靠近中国游水畅通员欢快剂耻辱事件时，却推崇出典型的“双重圭臬”：一方面起劲为本国畅通员解脱，但另一方面却疏远寰宇反欢快剂机构（WADA）屡次解说与瑞士寂然巡逻官阐发，申斥中国反欢快剂中心和WADA一说念“掩盖真相”，条件对中国畅通员扩充制裁。

正如媒体报说念所言，奈顿欢快剂阳性案件的诸多疑窦仍悬而未决。据联系商议标明，群勃龙是一种卵白同化制剂，具有极强的晋升力量和爆发力的作用，并不是常见的耻辱物资。连年来，全球发生了数以百计的群勃龙阳性。据公开信息表露，绝大大批阳性齐是基于四年禁赛的圭臬赐与处罚，仅三名好意思国畅通员因见地食物耻辱而脱逃了处罚。在奈顿案件中，该案件的寂然仲裁人裁定，受耻辱的肉类来自佛罗里达州的一家餐馆。问题在于：USADA在事隔两个月后才开展探问，恰巧又从归并家餐馆购买的不同批次的牛肉中检出了群勃龙，如斯赶巧确实让东说念主匪夷所想。要是好意思国市集的牛肉竟然存在精深的群勃龙耻辱，USADA是否开展过世俗的市集探问，是否作念过数据统计，是否领导过好意思国畅通员精通肉食物耻辱的问题，是否商议过吃些许耻辱的肉类会导致畅通员检测阳性？USADA慎重东说念主在WADA尚未审查档册，上诉期限并未纵脱的情况下即发表公开声明宣称“正义得到了伸张”。更值得怀疑的是，该声明刻下已被USADA从官网中撤稿，与之一并被撤稿的还包括其过往无纰谬耻辱案件的声明与报说念。如斯反常的行动到底是在粉饰什么？

从奈顿案件中可见一斑：USADA嘴上倡导着诊疗自制纯洁，实验行动却以火去蛾中。其表态与实验行动鬻矛誉盾更体刻下好意思国的办事体育定约和大学体育定约（NCAA）自行制定反欢快剂圭臬，与《寰宇反欢快剂条例》存在光显突破，USADA也不合他们进行查验，变成了浩瀚的体育暗箱。USADA是《寰宇反欢快剂条例》的签约方，但看成好意思国收视率最高的几个办事体育联赛的定约——好意思国办事棒球大定约（MLB）、好意思国办事篮球联赛（NBA）、好意思国办事橄榄球大定约（NFL）以及北好意思办事冰球定约（NHL）却不受《寰宇反欢快剂条例》的统治，且看成绝大大批最告成的好意思国畅通员的栽种者——NCAA也未签署《寰宇反欢快剂条例》。2006年的《米切尔阐发》曾指出超越八十五名现役和退役棒球畅通员使用了欢快剂，有球员宣称，百分之四十、五十，致使百分之八十的球员齐在使用类固醇。WADA现任主席班卡在近期会议中暗示：“高达90%的好意思国畅通员，包括办事和大学体育畅通员莫得盲从WADA联系条例。”此外，2020年收效的《罗琴科夫反欢快剂法》允许该国对海外体育赛事中的欢快剂事件实行“域外刑事统治权”。该法案宣称是为了打击欢快剂行动，但却将好意思国国内的办事联赛、大学联赛等赛事摒除在外，这也阐发好意思国政府对于其国表里的反欢快剂责任光显接纳了双重圭臬。

USADA对本身历久以来的反欢快剂“陈规”有目无睹，反而执迷于“越界统治”，条件对其他国度扩充制裁，妄图通过申斥、打击中国过甚他国度以转动其国内反欢快剂责任中存在的严重瑕疵，这是赤裸裸的政事操弄和乌有双标。自本年4月以来，好意思国国会、反欢快剂机构、媒体在中国游水畅通员食物耻辱案件上专门聘请性失明失聪，企图通过执造谋害稠浊口角，让海外社会与群众产生无理贯通，并借此将反欢快剂问题政事化，饱读舞好意思国王法部和联邦探问局动用国内王法和政事技术进行探问，发起对该事件的“长臂统治”。如斯不顾吃相的恶劣步履，不仅是彻首彻尾的“双重圭臬”，一经对“自制自制”理念的鼎力糟踏。咱们再次激烈敦促USADA住手东说念主为制造子虚叙事和泛政事化的贯通操弄，住手侵扰和玩忽运行灵验的寰宇反欢快剂纪律和惩处体系，住手以所谓的“法律技术”搞胁迫施压和滥施“长臂统治”；从头凝视其在处理欢快剂案件时的法度和原则，确保其行动与全球反欢快剂体系的想法相符，况且在反欢快剂责任中概况展现出应有的诚信和一致性，以从头得到海外社会对其责任的信任。

CHINADA Statement on the U.S. Olympian Erriyon Knighton’s Positive Test for Steroid

China Anti-Doping Agency (CHINADA) noted that the Global Times has published a report on the doubts about the Adverse Analytical Finding (AAF) case of the U.S. sprinting star Erriyon Knighton. Knighton, a member of the U.S. Olympic track and field team, tested positive for a banned steroid (trenbolone) during an out-of-competition test on March 26. In a surprising turn, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) abruptly decided before the start of the domestic qualifiers for the Paris Olympics that no ineligibility would be imposed on Knighton, claiming that Knighton’s positive result for trenbolone was caused by his ingestion of contaminated meat, and allowed him to eventually represent the United States at the Paris Olympics.

However, when it comes to the contamination cases of the Chinese swimmers, USADA has shown a typical double standard by trying its best to clear American athletes on one hand, but on the other hand accusing CHINADA and the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) of “covering up the truth” and demanding sanctions against Chinese athletes while ignoring the repeated clarifications by WADA and the report by the Independent Prosecutor.

As reported by the media, many suspicions about Knighton’s AAF case remain unresolved. Studies have shown that trenbolone is an anabolic agent with strong enhancing effects on strength and explosiveness, and is not a common contaminant. Hundreds of AAF cases for trenbolone have occurred around the world in recent years in total, and publicly available information shows that while the athletes involved in most of these trenbolone AAF cases were essentially given a four-year ineligibility, three American athletes have escaped sanctions by claiming food contamination. In the Knighton case, the independent arbitrator concluded that the contaminated meat in this case came from a restaurant in Florida. Here’s the problem: it’s a strange coincidence that while USADA didn’t start investigation until two months later, it happened to detect trenbolone in a different batch of beef purchased from the same restaurant. If there is indeed widespread beef contamination of trenbolone in the U.S. market, has USADA ever conducted an extensive market research and collected data? Has it warned the American athletes about the problem of meat contamination? Has it studied how much contaminated meat can cause a positive test? The CEO of USADA publicly declared in a statement that “justice was served” before WADA had even reviewed the case and before the deadline for appeal had yet expired. What is even more suspicious is that this statement has now been removed from USADA’s website, along with its previous statements and releases on no-fault contamination cases. What are they trying to hide behind this unusual action?

The Knighton case just shows that USADA’s rhetoric about fairness and clean sport runs counter to its actual practices. This contradiction is even more evident in the fact that the main professional leagues and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) of the U.S. have their own standards for anti-doping that are in clear conflict with the World Anti-Doping Code (the Code), and that these athletes are not subject to any testing by USADA. This has created a huge backroom in sport. While USADA is a signatory to the Code, the most-watched sports leagues in the U.S.—the Major League Baseball (MLB), the National Basketball Association (NBA), the National Football League (NFL), and the National Hockey League (NHL)—are not protected by the Code, and the NCAA, the cradle of the vast majority of the most successful American athletes, has not signed the Code. The Mitchell Report published in 2006 named more than 85 active and retired baseball players who had doped. Some players claimed that 40%, 50%, or even 80% of the baseball athletes were taking steroids. The WADA President, Mr. Witold Bańka also pointed out in a recent meeting that “90% of American athletes, those in pro leagues and college sport, don’t compete under World Anti-Doping Code”.

品牌与产品的区别：OEM主要关注产品制造，而品牌则涉及更多如故事、服务和体验。

In addition, the Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act, which came into effect in 2020, asserts criminal jurisdiction over doping cases in international sports events that occurred outside its national borders. This act, while claiming to be combating doping offenses, excludes its domestic professional leagues, college leagues and other U.S. events. This is another obvious example of the double standards that the U.S. is practicing when targeting its anti-doping work towards American athletes and athletes from other countries.

The U.S. has turned a blind eye to its long history of doping problems, but is obsessed with “cross-border jurisdiction” and asserting sanctions against other countries. It seems that the accusation and attack on China and other countries is its tactic to deflect attention from the serious flaws in its own anti-doping work. This is sheer political manipulation and hypocritical double standards. Since April this year, the U.S. Congress, USADA and the U.S. media have adopted a selective approach when it comes to the contamination cases of the Chinese swimmers when they attempt to mislead the international community and the general public by confusing right and wrong through fabrication and frame-up. Moreover, they are trying to politicize anti-doping by instigating the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to initiate a “long-arm jurisdiction” over this case by opening an investigation using its domestic judicial and administrative means. Such utterly disgraceful and despicable attempts are not only a stark double standard, but are also wanton violations of the principles of fairness and justice.

Once again, we urge USADA to cease fabricating false narratives九游会体育, politicizing anti doping and manipulating public perception, to stop disrupting and undermining the well-functioning world anti-doping order and global governance system, and to put an end to the abuse of “long-arm jurisdiction” and threatening and pressuring with so-called “legal means”. We call on USADA to review the approaches and principles it has adopted in doping cases to ensure compliance with the goals of the global anti-doping system, and to demonstrate due integrity and consistency in their work. This is the right way to regain trust of the international community in its anti-doping work.